![]() ![]() Its actions to suppress the New York Post story about Hunter’s laptop were far less defensible. Twitter’s decision to delete pornographic pictures of Hunter Biden was entirely justified and appropriate. One can certainly agree or disagree with the way in which they exercised those rights. Instead, they detail the exercise of First Amendment rights by independent, private actors. ![]() The “TWITTER FILES” released so far do not describe a violation of the First Amendment. This means the First Amendment protects Twitter, the Biden campaign team, and the Democratic National Committee. ![]() But, as the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently explained, “hosting speech on a private platform … is hardly ‘an activity that only governmental entities have traditionally performed.’” Social-media companies are not the government. government at all levels-local, state, and federal.Īctivists have tried to argue that large social-media companies essentially function as the government, citing a line of cases that treat private parties as government actors when the private parties perform functions that are “ traditionally and exclusively governmental.” Examples include running elections, private prisons, and so-called company towns. The text of the amendment itself says that “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.” That restraint on Congress has since been extended to apply to the U.S. The First Amendment regulates government conduct. This matters for a simple but profoundly important reason. Twitter is not an arm of the government it is a private company. The Democratic National Committee (which also asked for Twitter to review tweets) is not an arm of the government. In October 2020, when the laptop story broke, Joe Biden was not president. Musk and Carlson are both profoundly wrong the documents released so far show no such thing. ![]() With characteristic breathless hyperbole, Carlson declared that the documents “show a systemic violation of the First Amendment, the largest example of that in modern history.” Last night, on Fox News, Tucker Carlson also picked up the claim about the First Amendment. Read: The far right is getting what it asked for Responding to a document where a Twitter employee indicated that Twitter had “handled” those posts, Musk tweeted, “If this isn’t a violation of the Constitution’s First Amendment, what is?” He followed up moments later with a slightly longer statement: “Twitter acting by itself to suppress free speech is not a 1st amendment violation, but acting under orders from the government to suppress free speech, with no judicial review, is.” He seemed particularly outraged that one of Taibbi’s tweets described how the “Biden team” asked Twitter to delete a series of tweets, including ones that contained nude pictures of Hunter Biden. Writing in National Review after last night’s release, Blehar said the thread contained “few, if any, explosive revelations” for those who’ve followed the story closely. I agree with the attorney and election analyst Jeffrey Blehar about Taibbi’s thread. Twitter suppressed the information based on its so-called hacked-materials policy, but the application of that policy was hardly clear in this instance, especially given that the platform had, at the time, just permitted widespread sharing of New York Times stories about Donald Trump’s leaked tax information. Taibbi’s documents provided further evidence demonstrating what Twitter’s critics ( including me) have long argued-that the decision to suppress the information was both incoherent and inconsistent. But it inadvertently did something else entirely: It exposed the new Twitter owner Elon Musk’s profound misunderstandings about the First Amendment. Last night, Matt Taibbi, an independent journalist, wrote a lengthy Twitter thread he called “THE TWITTER FILES.” The thread purported to expose how Twitter made the decision to dramatically suppress discussion of the contents of a hard drive from Hunter Biden’s laptop. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |